One of the central principles of bankruptcy is that a debtor should have the benefit of a “fresh start.” However, to accord such relief, the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, and case law require transparency from the debtor and other parties in interest. As such, strict compliance with bankruptcy reporting requirements is a primary responsibility of a debtor in possession (DIP).1
Courts expect a DIP to keep proper records and file required disclosures and reports in a timely manner. A DIP’s failure to do so may result in the:
Three general points:
Upon filing a chapter 11 petition (the “Petition Date”), or within 14 days thereafter (unless ordered otherwise), the DIP must file, among other things:
The purpose of these filings is to give all interested parties a clear sense of the DIP’s financial situation at the outset of the bankruptcy case.
After the Petition Date, ongoing disclosures are necessary to enhance transparency of the DIP’s actions and reorganization progress. A DIP that continues to operate during the case must file periodic reports and summaries of its business operations, including:
Additionally, the DIP must report information related to any employee tax withholdings (i.e., the source of the tax withholding [city, state, federal], the withheld amount, and the location of those funds).9
The Office of the United States Trustee requires the DIP to file operating reports on a monthly basis through the effective date of a confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation, or until conversion or dismissal of the bankruptcy case. Additionally, the DIP must file, on or before the last day of the month after each calendar quarter, a report calculating the statutorily-required fee to be paid to the United States Trustee.
Section 1106(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code incorporates in chapter 11 cases a number of the duties set out in section 704(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (which apply to cases under other chapters) and lays out more reporting requirements. Section 1106(a)(1) requires a DIP to furnish information concerning the estate and the estate’s administration to a requesting party in interest. A DIP may request a court place reasonable restrictions on requests for information by parties in interest.
Parties in interest, however, may also acquire information from the DIP by deposition of employees, officers, directors, or owners of the DIP—or even of their accountants and bankers. Parties then document discovery under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004, by means of what practitioners often call a “Rule 2004 Examination.” A Rule 2004 Examination is a powerful tool that creditors and other parties in interest may use to enforce or enhance a DIP’s reporting duties, and can presage efforts to remove a DIP and cause the appointment of a case trustee to secure creditor relief (e.g., relief from the automatic stay), or to convert or dismiss a chapter 11 case.
Section 1106(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (also via incorporation of section 704(a) duties) requires a DIP to make a final report and file a final account of the administration of the estate with the court and the United States Trustee. The final report and account together comprise a comprehensive filing that summarizes the administration of the estate. It also includes itemized statements of property received and disposed of, and the details surrounding important events (e.g., sale price, purchaser, etc. with respect to sales of assets). As the name suggests, the final report is filed at the conclusion of the case.
Bankruptcy reporting requirements may seem onerous, however these reporting requirements are necessary to make the process more transparent for all parties involved.
©All Rights Reserved. August, 2021. DailyDACTM, LLC
Rick is Chair of the firm’s Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Commercial Law Practice. With over 35 years of experience in commercial law, workouts, and reorganizations, he maintains a national practice, focusing on insolvency issues, business restructurings, and mediations. Rick serves as an adjunct professor of law at Boston University School of Law. He is recognized for…
Eric is an associate in Mintz Levin’s Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Commercial Law Group. Eric’s practice focuses primarily on commercial law and corporatere organization through representation of debtors, creditors, bond trustees and bond insurers. Prior to joining the firm, Eric served as legal counsel at the Massachusetts State House. While there, he worked on issues such…
Selling Distressed Assets: The Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Alternative
What Secured Lenders Should Know If Their Borrower Files for Bankruptcy
Dealing with Corporate Distress 07: Chapter 11 is Not Always the Answer: Strategic Alternatives For and Against Distressed Businesses
3 Special Issues in Healthcare Restructurings
Dealing with Corporate Distress 06: Four Basic Chapter 11 Concepts to Know Before We Go any Further
The Importance of Liquidity in the Capital Structure of a Distressed Company
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.