When a business files for Chapter 11, it doesn’t stop needing cash. In fact, its need for cash becomes even more pressing and complicated, which is why on the first day of a bankruptcy case, debtors often seek interim approval to use cash collateral or obtain debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing.
While these initial arrangements in a bankruptcy petition’s early days can include terms that are later revisited once a creditors’committee is formed and the US Trustee gets involved, cash collateral and debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing orders are powerful tools that can keep a distressed company alive while its stakeholders sort out who gets paid what and when.
‘Cash collateral’ is more than cold, hard cash. Section 363(a) of the Bankruptcy Code defines ‘cash collateral’ as including assets like:
Secured creditors have liens that attach to bank accounts, receivables, and other cash-like assets like those listed above through instruments like UCC-1 financing statements or rent assignments. And, as James Sullivan, secured lender’s counsel with Seyfarth Shaw LLP, observes, “unless the secured creditor says otherwise, a debtor can’t touch that cash without their okay — or a court order.”
In short, if a lender has a security interest in it, and the debtor wants to use it, it’s cash collateral.
In cases where a secured lender is willing to let the debtor use cash collateral, they want something in return: ‘adequate protection.’
Adequate protection provisions may include:
Defining ‘adequate protection’ can be a hotly contested topic, which can consume valuable time during a critical process. The question of what constitutes ‘adequate protection’ raises many complicated, nuanced questions upon which the debtor and lender must agree, with one of the most fundamental being asset value. As Richard Corbi, debtor’s counsel with the Law Offices of Richard J. Corbi, points out, “Valuation fights are not simple ‘then-and-now’ comparisons. They often involve dueling experts and differing appraisals.”
Corbi emphasizes that while a debtor might sometimes run for a time on cash collateral, as in the case of a hotel pulling in steady revenue, it is rare. After all, companies in bankruptcy are there for a reason: they’re usually burning cash, not generating it.
Most of the time, debtors will also need ‘DIP financing,’ which is a loan extended to the DIP during the bankruptcy case. These loans, or lines of credit, are governed by financing agreements, which the bankruptcy court reviews. They are most commonly issued by the DIP’s pre-bankruptcy petition lender — likely the only lender familiar with the DIP and its circumstances well enough to assess risk under the time constraints. Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code outlines several special protections for DIP lenders.
Without DIP financing, even a short delay in funding can mean game over for the debtor.
Under Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code, DIP financing options escalate in priority and risk:
Priming liens are powerful, but the most risky and controversial. They can upend existing lender priorities and require strong evidence that the debtor can’t get credit on any less aggressive terms. Still, Sullivan notes, “Priming liens are fairly common today — especially when there’s no unencumbered collateral and the debtor is desperate.”
In approaching an order, each side has its own priorities: debtors want flexibility, lenders want control, and creditors’ committees want oversight. “If there’s money for investigations, that’s a win for the committee,” Lauren Macksoud, committee counsel with Dentons, explains. “If not, we may end up with no real ability to challenge liens or uncover fraudulent transfers.”
Typical flashpoints in the order drafting process include:
In negotiating order terms, critical leverage can shift from debtor to lender. To that end, Corbi warns, “Debtors shouldn’t be forced into bad deals just because they’re desperate. The court needs to ensure fairness in the process.”
One of the few unencumbered assets in bankruptcy is avoidance actions, especially preference and fraudulent transfer claims. These can be a lifeline for unsecured creditors.
Both Macksoud and Sullivan note that lenders sometimes try to gain indirect control over these through superpriority claims or roll-ups. Committees fight hard to preserve them, often insisting on express carveouts to keep these assets off-limits.
Cash collateral and DIP financing orders are at the heart of every Chapter 11. They’re complex, controversial, and often make the difference between a successful reorganization and a crash-and-burn liquidation.
_______________________________________________________________________
To learn more about this topic, view Advanced Bankruptcy Transactions / Negotiating and Drafting Cash Collateral/DIP Financing Orders.The quoted remarks referenced in this article were made either during this webinar or shortly thereafter during post-webinar interviews with the panelists. Readers may also be interested to read other articles about cash collateral and DIP financing orders.
This article was originally published on July 31, 2025.
©2025. DailyDACTM, LLC. This article is subject to the disclaimers found here.
The editors and editorial board of DailyDAC include preeminent restructuring and insolvency professionals, journalists, and editors. They are devoted to providing reliable and plain English education and deal intelligence about assignments, corporate bankruptcy, receiverships, out-of-court workouts and similar topics.
The Preference Wave Is Coming- What Vendors Should Do Now
Bankruptcy Basics and the Impacts of COVID-19
Debtor Eligibility for Subchapter V and Chapter 13 Expected to Rise
How To Defend Against Bankruptcy Avoidance Actions
HERTZ After Cert Denial: Make-Wholes, Solvent Debtors, and the Reach of § 502(b)(2)
What the First Brands Implosion Teaches Lenders about Cash Collateral in Bankruptcy