John B asks: What is a composition agreement?
A composition agreement is an out-of-court contract between a debtor and multiple creditors providing for the reduction or delay in payment of amounts owed by the debtor to the creditors entering into the composition. Entering into a composition is an alternative to filing Chapter 11 that can provide some, but not all, of the benefits of Chapter 11.
A composition agreement can be a good option for debtors that have a small amount of creditors and good relationships with those creditors. Additionally, successfully negotiating a composition agreement is much more likely when a debtor’s creditors have an interest in the debtor’s ongoing survival. A debtor with a large number of dispersed creditors that have no interest in the continued survival of the debtor’s business will likely be unable to successfully negotiate a composition agreement.
One of the drawbacks to a composition is that it only binds the consenting creditors, thus creating the potential for “holdouts” and related issues. The possibility of holdouts can also dissuade otherwise agreeable creditors from consenting to a composition because holdout creditors continue to retain their full claims, creating financial risk and uncertainty for the agreeable creditors. The relief available through a composition can be further limited by the need for unanimous approval.
Moreover, a composition does not provide any of the procedural or substantive advantages of the Bankruptcy Code, such as the protection of the automatic stay or the ability to reject burdensome executory contracts.
In contrast to a composition, a court-approved restructuring under the Bankruptcy Code binds holdouts and provides a debtor with certain procedural and substantive benefits (e.g., the assumption of beneficial, or rejection of burdensome, executory contracts or leases).
Under the Bankruptcy Code’s class-based voting scheme, a class is deemed to accept a plan if two-thirds in amount and more than one-half in number of the voting class members vote to accept the plan. Further, in certain circumstances, a plan can be confirmed via “cramdown” to bind rejecting classes. In addition, the Bankruptcy Code provides a debtor with the tools to implement a more substantial restructuring of its capital structure and operations. Bankruptcy, however, is typically slower and more expensive than a composition. Bankruptcy proceedings tend to attract public attention, while composition agreements typically remain private.
[Editor’s Note: This 90 Second Lesson is part of our irregular series in which we answer readers’ questions. If you have a question, submit it to [email protected] and we will try to answer it. This lesson is based, in substantial part, in material reprinted from Commercial Bankruptcy Litigation 2d and/or Strategic Alternatives for and Against Distressed Businesses, with permission of Thomson Reuters.]
©All Rights Reserved. April, 2020. DailyDACTM, LLC
The editors and editorial board of DailyDAC include preeminent restructuring and insolvency professionals, journalists, and editors. They are devoted to providing reliable and plain English education and deal intelligence about assignments, corporate bankruptcy, receiverships, out-of-court workouts and similar topics.
90 Second Lesson: Deciphering California Receiverships
90 Second Lesson: What is the Difference Between Recharacterization and Equitable Subordination?
Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege is in the Hands of the Bankruptcy Trustee
The Elegant Swan and Clumsy Duck: What is Recharacterization in Bankruptcy?
The Fisker Case: My Credit Bid Capped at the Amount I Paid for the Debt?
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Replacing a Debtor’s Management with a Chapter 11 Trustee
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter!
Get weekly updates with the latest bankruptcy articles and opportunistic deals.