Editors’ Note: this is part of our irregular series in which we answer readers’ questions. If you have a question, submit it to firstname.lastname@example.org and we will try to answer it.
Do secured creditors benefit more from a debtor’s bankruptcy or federal court receivership?
In some situations, secured creditors would benefit more from a bankruptcy proceeding than a receivership. Secured creditors should note, though, that if a bankruptcy case is filed after the appointment of a receiver, then the filing will trump the receiver’s appointment. As William S. Schwartz and Christopher J. Horvay explain in greater detail here, the appointment of a receiver itself may constitute grounds for creditors to file an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding.
Note: This 90 Second Lesson is based, in substantial part, in material reprinted from Commercial Bankruptcy Litigation 2d and Strategic Alternatives for and Against Distressed Businesses, with permission of Thomson Reuters. For more information about these publications, please visit www.legalsolutions.com.
The editors and editorial board of DailyDAC include preeminent restructuring and insolvency professionals, journalists, and editors. They are devoted to providing reliable and plain English education and deal intelligence about assignments, corporate bankruptcy, receiverships, out-of-court workouts an similar topics.
90 Second Lesson: What is a “UCC Article 9” Sale?
90 Second Lesson: To Stalk or Not to Stalk? Why be a Stalking Horse Bidder?
90 Second Lesson: How to assess whether a distressed business can be turned around?
Review of the NAFER 2018 Annual Conference in Chicago
NAFER 2017 Annual Conference: The Biggest and Best So Far!
NAFER 2017 Annual Conference [Oct. 18-20]: Miami, and a Ponzi Schemer Speaks!
Our weekly newsletter, sent every Tuesday at 9am, includes: